Asus M3A78-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M3A78-EM  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101008
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 03:28
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 88.3
47% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 172
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 65
Parallax 54.5
32% 52.9 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 53
43% 52.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 78 77 82 93 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 75.6
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50%
Great: 62%
Maxtor STM3160215A 160GB
80GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 76 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 73
Write 11.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 75
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
55GB free, PID 0225
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 17.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 25
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 4.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 2.6
10% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2
110% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A78-EM Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A78-EM - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback