Alienware Aurora-R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0RV30W
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100628
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 20:32
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7 860-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.3% Average
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 147
54% 113 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 354
39% 301 Pts
64-Core 352
24% 352 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.54
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
30.3% Below average
Lighting 117
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 117
31% 104 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 112
Splatting 81.9
30% 90.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 71 60 57 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 216
Write 147
Mixed 140
SusWrite 65.2
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 7.3
37% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 1
DQ Mixed 23.8
26% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26%
Great: 55%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
21GB free
Firmware: 010G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 64 68 61 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 234
Write 106
Mixed 138
SusWrite 64.2
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 10.6
63% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 28.5
42% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$42
228GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 92 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 90.5
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 91.1
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL8-4GBXM0 F3-12800CL9-4GBZL0 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aurora-R2 Builds (Compare 314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Alienware Aurora-R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback