To S133GR210

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Systemintel intel
MotherboardTo S133GR210  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191012
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 15:08
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 39.6
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 77.1
33% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 83.6
8-Core 94.5
12% 89.1 Pts
64-Core 78.3
5% 78.3 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6952
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.94 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.52
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS606 256GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0712B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 342 360 354 351 345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 404
Write 357
Mixed 346
SusWrite 349
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 23.1
101% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 50
75% 142 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback