Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7300-$90 2,712 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 71 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 45.9 34% 47 Pts	4-Core 46 8-Core 44.6 6% 45.3 Pts	64-Core 45.1 3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT 2,041 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 01F2) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.31 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.88 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 101 106 110 108 107 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 171 Write 119 Mixed 119 SusWrite 114 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 17.6 65% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 38.1 DQ Mixed 24.8 20% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T7250Intel $97Bench 34%, 3,604 samples	7x
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T5550Intel $180Bench 31%, 1,461 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8600M GTNvidiaBench 1%, 2,041 samples	14x
GeForce 8400M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,357 samples	1x
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	1x

SSD
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	1x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $97

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16