HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190820
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 252 91% 161 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 813 78% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,132 70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.5% Above average	Lighting 63 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 50.4 51% 58.6 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 63.7 Splatting 66.3 55% 67 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 21 30 14 33 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 564 Write 154 Mixed 222 SusWrite 36.5 53% 244 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 23.7 114% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 47.3 92% 191 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 690GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 163 162 161 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 163 Mixed 99 SusWrite 162 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB 4,169 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,366x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,000x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	707x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,319x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	827x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	708x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,390x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,219x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	291x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,884x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	777x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	451x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16