Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190124
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 23:40
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 147 2-Core 290 98% 177 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 832 82% 671 Pts	64-Core 793 49% 793 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 147 Parallax 130 111% 138 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 166 Splatting 117 108% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,528 Write 2,268 Mixed 1,475 464% 2,090 MB/s	4K Read 66.6 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 88.1 291% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,806 DQ Write 1,336 DQ Mixed 1,280 1,035% 1,474 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 202GB free Firmware: 0005DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 92 92 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 115 Write 82.2 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 91.3 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 58%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB 2,156 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 430GB free Firmware: GN003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 79 77 79 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 67.5 Write 68.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 77.3 42% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 45%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2GB free Firmware: AV001D Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 65 Write 67.5 Mixed 36.8 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB 1,766 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 156 158 157 155 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 165 Write 167 Mixed 130 SusWrite 157 210% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 70%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 179GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 112 114 112 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 113 108% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.2% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	882x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	546x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	204x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $552

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16