| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 13 '19 at 21:21 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.4%
Below average
|
45% 67 Pts
|
13% 91.9 Pts
|
6% 94.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.08%
Terrible
|
1% 1.37 fps
|
1% 1.51 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 107 54 12 67 64 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
48% 219 MB/s
|
46% 11.3 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 60 59 60 60 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
36% 49.3 MB/s
|
125% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.7%
Very poor
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
33% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 2,565 samples | 62x |
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 48x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples | 37x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |