Acer Predator G5900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Predator G5900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5900
Memory13.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 21:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 388
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 41.6
41% 46.1 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 43
Splatting 37.8
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX 124GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 102 123 116 112 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
Read 211
Write 156
Mixed 116
SusWrite 115
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 9.3
45% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 85.1
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 13
21% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
489GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 89 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 95.1
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 90.1
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 107
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0198 9905403-559.A00LF 0198 9905403-559.A00LF 0198 9905403-559.A00LF 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5900 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback