MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 17:18
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 744
76% 601 Pts
64-Core 1013
68% 1013 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 93%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$108
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 353
Write 436
Mixed 346
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 37.7
88% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
264% 351 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 147
Write 135
Mixed 99
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 22.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 59,684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback