Zoostorm 7200-5016B

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5016B (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte B85-HD3
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140924
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 17:10
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 210 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 542 56% 450 Pts	64-Core 553 34% 553 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 59.3 56% 65 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 65.3 55% 67 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 141 195 217 211 217 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.5% Good	Read 235 Write 149 Mixed 168 SusWrite 194 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 27.6 106% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 171 130% 175 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 149 153 154 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 153 Write 150 Mixed 93 SusWrite 152 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB 12,839 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5016B Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-5016B

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	6x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 16GBKingstonBench 54%, 83 samples	3x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	2x
M378B5173BH0-CK0 1315 BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. M378B5173BH0-CK0 1315 BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $502

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16