Zoostorm 7200-5016B

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5016B (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte B85-HD3
Memory	0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140924
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 16:26
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$350 144,011 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 162 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 425 45% 351 Pts	64-Core 457 31% 457 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$210 459,268 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.3% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 51.8 48% 56.9 fps	MRender 63.1 Gravity 56 Splatting 58.9 46% 59.4 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$125 647,981 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 167 148 134 138 139 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.4% Good	Read 241 Write 223 Mixed 216 SusWrite 158 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 34.8 114% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 187 140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$79 130,399 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 150 154 155 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 145 Write 144 Mixed 91 SusWrite 153 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB 9,542 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 3.2 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5016B Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-5016B

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $164Bench 71%, 200,551 samples	3x
Core i7-4770KIntel $350Bench 78%, 144,011 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 34%, 339,830 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $210Bench 53%, 459,268 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,110,464 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $125Bench 110%, 647,981 samples	1x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 49%, 30,063 samples	1x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 16GBKingstonBench 55%, 67 samples	1x
CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 9,542 samples	1x
CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 16GBUnknownBench 53%, 42 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16