Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150 8,564 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 71 2-Core 111 56% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 210 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8411) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.53 2% 1.82 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 221 Write 364 Mixed 246 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 34.9 112% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 217 166% 225 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 6GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,553 Write 22.1 Mixed 28 383% 534 MB/s	4K Read 227 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 9,544% 76 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905595-011.A Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A160 9905595-011.A Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A160 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.6% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 14.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	61x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16