Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 150%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 06:35
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9700K-$356
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
100% Outstanding
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
100% 213 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,120
104% 846 Pts
64-Core 1126
76% 1126 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$724
Nvidia(10DE 13A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (153 fps cap detected)
44.8% Average
Lighting 154
Reflection 152
Parallax 154
40% 153 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 154
Splatting 154
45% 154 fps
Poor: 111%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$160
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 1487 1421 1393 1328 1257 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,622
Write 1,794
Mixed 1,095
SusWrite 1,410
385% 1,730 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 81
286% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,478
DQ Write 1,293
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,027% 1377 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 341%
Great: 395%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
304GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 474 479 483 480 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 488
Mixed 455
SusWrite 477
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.1
221% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 135%
Great: 135%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
168GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 110
Write 36.3
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 35.4
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 75%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
23GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 32 35 32 35 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 145
Write 39.7
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 33.8
76% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.9
89% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3000C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 32.9
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 10,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,552
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback