Asus C51/MCP51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAsus C51/MCP51  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061130
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 04:31
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 65.7
26% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 68
8-Core 48.9
8% 58.5 Pts
64-Core 74.7
5% 74.7 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 21%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 55 47 48 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 20.4
Write 20.7
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 44.2
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical C51/MCP51 Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus C51/MCP51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $25
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback