PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5G41T-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110117 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 13 '19 at 03:20 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Asus(1043 8477) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 134 140 117 119 121 MB/s
|
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
931GB free
Firmware: HP13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 138 163 126 132 139 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
|||
General UDisk 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.7 3.5 MB/s
|
3.83%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples | 103x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 66x |
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 145x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 54x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $310 |