Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 03:13
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 122 57% 92.5 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 358 34% 280 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Zotac(19DA 288B) 1GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 16.9 16% 17.2 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 16.6 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$112 26,139 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 252 313 285 289 327 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.6% Good	Read 84.3 Write 236 Mixed 283 SusWrite 281 51% 221 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 30.6 88% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 236 186% 258 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 618GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 123 111 118 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 52 Write 89.3 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 115 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 202% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 711GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 21 16 14 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 63.1 Write 147 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 16.2 44% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 742GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 29 35 29 70 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 25.2 Write 37.6 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 47.8 30% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.4 115% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139 396 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: DN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 146 159 122 129 135 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 150 138 147 154 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 92 Write 106 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 142 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 200% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1TB free Firmware: TR71 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 59 52 58 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 10.8 Write 7 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 55.4 14% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 482GB free Firmware: 0010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 59 52 58 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 83.9 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 55.4 42% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 1600EL Series F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 1600EL Series 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16