Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 00:21
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770S-$102 13,157 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 158 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 440 48% 377 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6255) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 37.1 31% 35.2 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 35.3 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 198 196 187 185 193 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.6% Average	Read 155 Write 192 Mixed 182 SusWrite 191 41% 180 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 11.3 85% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 77.7 77% 122 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 168 170 170 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 188 Mixed 29 SusWrite 170 103% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 0619 SLA304G08-GGNHM 12GB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.6 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	413x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	396x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	350x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	155x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	215x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16