Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 880 808 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 405 48% 370 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 18.9 12% 16.2 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD240HAFV-000DA 240GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM02W1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 245 244 234 245 244 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.1% Good	Read 257 Write 245 Mixed 204 SusWrite 240 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 24.1 95% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 92.3 87% 138 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL0 PSD34G133381 F3-10666CL9-4GBRL0 PSD34G133381 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $367

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16