Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140801
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 00:05
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51 10,924 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Memory 42.4 1-Core 44.1 2-Core 85.7 34% 57.4 Pts	4-Core 60.7 8-Core 54.4 8% 57.6 Pts	64-Core 52.9 3% 52.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 21.2 15% 18.5 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 21.9 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 95 67 89 67 56 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 187 Write 179 Mixed 168 SusWrite 79.8 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 14.7 68% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 92.9 75% 105 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 247GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 76 89 81 78 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 113 Write 109 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 82.3 60% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB 3,140 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 4.1 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	21x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	17x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16