Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 00:04
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 824
77% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 81.8
46% 68 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 57.2
Splatting 54.1
48% 59 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 796 798 794 782 775 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,855
SusWrite 835
426% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 82.8
275% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 731
554% 750 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 274%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
132GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 297 298 297 295 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 481
Mixed 425
SusWrite 316
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 57.5
189% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 369
278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
481GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 79 82 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 83
Write 99.7
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 79.3
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
169% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71
409GB free
Firmware: MKAONS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 127 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 97.3
Write 100
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 127
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 145 147 143 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 144
Write 149
Mixed 102
SusWrite 145
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
570GB free
Firmware: 0105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 133
Mixed 96
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $486
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback