Foxconn G41MX 2.0/G41MX-K 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn G41MX 2.0/G41MX-K 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090904
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 23:30
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5450-$195 10,801 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 86 42% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 156 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 2629) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 3.03 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 3.38 2% 3.35 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 1.83 2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 47 47 47 48 47 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.3% Poor	Read 168 Write 96.5 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 72 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 11.2 48% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 11.6 DQ Write 22.6 DQ Mixed 17 13% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 0GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22.3 Write 15 Mixed 16.5 22% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 12%
Generic External 500GB 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 338GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 0.9 1 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.83 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G41MX 2.0/G41MX-K 2.0 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn G41MX 2.0/G41MX-K 2.0

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	7x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	7x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	24x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	54x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	9x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16