Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 23:25
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 79 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 514 69% 516 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 374A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 23.3 20% 25.6 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 32.3 25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB 5,131 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 211 168 134 100 104 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 430 Mixed 385 SusWrite 183 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 45.8 157% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 355 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 106%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 29GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 422 432 441 411 276 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 435 Mixed 420 SusWrite 401 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 50.6 169% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 294 240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 589GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 165 170 167 171 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 164 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB 3,829 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.4% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 23.5 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	86x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	65x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	175x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	72x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	40x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $938

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16