Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Memory 25.7 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 45.1 19% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 20.7 8-Core 63.1 5% 41.9 Pts	64-Core 65.4 4% 65.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.88 1% 1.21 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.91 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTS400S 128GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0918B SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 88 130 130 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 296 Write 135 Mixed 163 SusWrite 113 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 13.4 44% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 78 64% 92.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	9.79% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 2.6 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 281 14% 281 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16