Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 168
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 326
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.4
39% 48.9 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 62
48% 59 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 42%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 430 428 427 432 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,717
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,147
SusWrite 467
269% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67.2
221% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 808
603% 800 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 202%
Great: 280%
Hitachi HTS545032A7E660 320GB
60GB free
Firmware: GRBZB230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 62
Write 57.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 47.5
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 46%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
647GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 165 166 169 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 150
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 165
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
116GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 41 4.7 31 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 118
Write 51.2
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 33.8
78% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
88% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
116GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 37 34 35 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 104
Write 48
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 40.6
71% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
70% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $462
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback