Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 646
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4128
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 63
50% 63.3 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 61.2
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 96 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 484
Write 402
Mixed 386
SusWrite 111
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 41.1
135% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 235
195% 281 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 124 124 123 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 56
SusWrite 124
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 26.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback