Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 7910
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 7910 (all builds)
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v4 177 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 169 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 658 62% 516 Pts	64-Core 1,142 71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000 640 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Nvidia(10DE 1129) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 106 Parallax 92.3 82% 99.9 fps	MRender 84 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 74.8 67% 83.3 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM87 512GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 234GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 55 65 67 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 357 Write 38 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 59.6 29% 135 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 11 52% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 93.8 65% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 118%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 477GB free Firmware: BXW75D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1503 1468 1388 1405 1352 1380 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,309 Write 1,188 Mixed 842 SusWrite 1416 268% 1,189 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 55.8 196% 71.3 MB/s	DQ Read 917 DQ Write 428 DQ Mixed 626 477% 657 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 262%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 477GB free Firmware: BXW75D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 1436 1440 1498 1436 1411 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,249 Write 1,463 Mixed 710 SusWrite 1,409 272% 1,208 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 54.9 198% 73.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,019 DQ Write 427 DQ Mixed 624 488% 690 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 262%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3A1 8x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	100% Outstanding	MC Read 47 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 37.9 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 16.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	60x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples	57x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	102x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	70x

SSD
CT1000P3SSD8 1TBBench 268%, 44,174 samples	68x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	29x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x

RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 8x8GBMicronBench 112%, 172 samples	40x
HMA81GR7AFR8N-UH 8x8GBHynixBench 112%, 137 samples	33x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 8x8GBHynixBench 109%, 271 samples	33x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16