Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 45.5 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 41.9 29% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 75.4 8-Core 86.3 11% 80.9 Pts	64-Core 92.2 6% 92.2 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 5151) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 1.78 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SF1M128GG56 128GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 269 279 263 267 248 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 342 Write 287 Mixed 190 SusWrite 264 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 15 60% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 122 102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 80%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17 2,906 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 170 Write 52.6 Mixed 27.3 80% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 6 481% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde F3 DDR3 1866 C11 1x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16