Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8850H 20,669 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 681 68% 551 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 86%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 9,737 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 768GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 502 487 483 514 555 513 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,280 Write 479 Mixed 421 SusWrite 509 148% 672 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 37.6 139% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 761 DQ Write 754 DQ Mixed 352 376% 623 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 251%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GB 6,167 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	628x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	418x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	234x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	336x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	134x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	66x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	177x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 4,980 samples	89x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	86x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16