Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850-15Z (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 13:13
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 79.2 1-Core 12.2 2-Core 47.7 35% 46.4 Pts	4-Core 58.4 8-Core 67.3 8% 62.9 Pts	64-Core 37.4 2% 37.4 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.09% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 5.28 5% 6.14 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 5.65 4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.09% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: JEDO SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 4.1 3.4 5.4 13 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Read 9.4 Write 21.1 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 5.9 8% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 10.7 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16