Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 09:15
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 39%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 155
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 419
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4141
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 17.1
9% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 31.5
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,246
Write 1,284
Mixed 1,039
266% 1,190 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 43.2
137% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 667
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 455
375% 541 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Seagate BUP Slim Mac SL 1TB
156GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 83.7
Write 62.5
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 89.1
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 63%
External USB 3.0 4TB
902GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 112 112 112 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 113
SusWrite 112
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback