Lenovo 20HJS1QT06

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20HJS1QT06  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJS1QT06
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, , 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 118
2-Core 223
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 609
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.27
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 33.8
22% 31.4 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 18.3
19% 24.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,142
Write 1,635
Mixed 1,357
379% 1,711 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 59.2
190% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 803
615% 826 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 25.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback