Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 218 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 607 60% 491 Pts	64-Core 642 40% 642 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.1 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 18.2 16% 17.5 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 20.1 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 70 69 53 73 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 410 Write 268 Mixed 233 SusWrite 81.4 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 16.3 49% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 40.8 32% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 46GB free Firmware: PB3OCA1G SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 43.1 Write 41.2 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 43 28% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 42%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 147 146 54 146 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 144 Write 132 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 121 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 24.2 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 22.1 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	414x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	238x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	283x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	218x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	193x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	81x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16