Advent Torino Z200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAdvent Torino Z200  (all builds)
MotherboardDSG 079114
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 00:03
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2815
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 29.9
26% 33.5 Pts
4-Core 30.7
8-Core 25.1
4% 27.9 Pts
64-Core 19.7
1% 19.7 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Device(1297 2041) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.88
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 82 84 87 89 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 53
Write 79
Mixed 29
SusWrite 87.5
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asint SSBC04G08-GDJ1B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.5
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback