PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MICRO-STAR MS-7596 |
Motherboard | MSI 785GM-E65 (MS-7596) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110218 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 11 '19 at 22:32 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 370-$153
PowerColor(148C 2015) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
|
21.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
APS-SL3N-240 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 165 166 94 73 97 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
148GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 99 100 103 103 102 MB/s
|
50.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
73GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 9x |
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples | 3x |
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $172 |