Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 21:38
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 149
59% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 308
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80% Excellent
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 107
Parallax 100
80% 102 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 97.6
79% 96.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 44 42 38 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 207
Write 51.7
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 38.9
20% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 8.8
40% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 46.7
54% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 44%
Samsung HD502IJ 240GB
168GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 193 203 208 206 328 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 119
Write 182
Mixed 206
SusWrite 230
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 29.1
101% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 209
180% 262 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 164 168 167 159 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 15.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 164
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8502 1600 CL9 Series 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8502 1600 CL9 Series 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $579
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback