Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 20:34
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 287
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 810
80% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 141
Parallax 122
104% 130 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 128
Splatting 110
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 126 128 131 128 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 428
Write 152
Mixed 199
SusWrite 130
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 33.9
142% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 118
92% 124 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 82%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
174GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 488 488 487 486 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 487
Mixed 470
SusWrite 487
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 62.2
209% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
869GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 127 129 131 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 86%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
182GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 148
Write 116
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 115
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.7
341% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
382% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 75%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback