Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 20:34
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 195
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 379
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 96
Reflection 107
Parallax 97.7
78% 100 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 95.9
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 49 40 42 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 238
Write 82.7
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 45.5
22% 103 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 10
52% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 56.1
DQ Mixed 52.8
56% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 44%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
168GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 196 204 302 203 307 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 141
Write 94
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 245
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 10.6
42% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 163 151 149 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 64.5
Write 170
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 156
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8502 1600 CL9 Series 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8502 1600 CL9 Series 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $575
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback