| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
| Memory | 28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 11 '19 at 19:12 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | MNE-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
79.4%
Very good
|
75% 132 Pts
|
69% 577 Pts
|
122% 1,978 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.6%
Below average
|
31% 42.3 fps
|
32% 41.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 189 214 247 209 172 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
55% 245 MB/s
|
99% 29.9 MB/s
|
44% 64.1 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
856GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 150 181 180 180 MB/s
|
99%
Outstanding
|
100% 138 MB/s
|
126% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston SNA-DC/U 1TB
381GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
37% 27.1 MB/s
|
73% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
57.7%
Above average
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,750 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z820 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 145x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 114x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |