Asus K73BY

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus K73BY (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K73BY
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120410
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '19 at 16:47
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	89%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 54.6 1-Core 17.4 2-Core 33.7 26% 35.2 Pts	4-Core 32.5 8-Core 32.2 4% 32.3 Pts	64-Core 33 2% 33 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 102C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.65 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X150 240GB 3,577 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 156 78 79 80 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36% Below average	Read 382 Write 218 Mixed 272 SusWrite 110 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 10.7 36% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 73.1 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 59.6 45% 61 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 88%
Verbatim Vi500 S3 480GB SSD 747 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 409GB free Firmware: V4.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 208 283 296 308 327 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 382 Write 340 Mixed 278 SusWrite 268 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 9.8 35% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 76.2 DQ Write 57.8 DQ Mixed 29.6 32% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 92%
WD 7500BPV External 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 675GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 23 23 24 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 21.5 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 22.4 28% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 6.3 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 4.1 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K73BY Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K73BY

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	7x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7470MAMDBench 2%, 449 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	3x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16