Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario WC839AA-ABE CQ5305ES (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Narra6
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '19 at 13:22
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 54.6 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 53 31% 46.3 Pts	4-Core 58.1 8-Core 69.6 8% 63.8 Pts	64-Core 70.9 4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 26 Parallax 32.5 27% 30.4 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 32.4 Splatting 33.3 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 418GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 43 45 29 36 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 33.5 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.9 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16