PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock G41C-GS R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151020 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 11 '19 at 12:48 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.13%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 193 200 218 216 218 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
133GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 41 40 40 MB/s
|
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 23x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 14x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 7x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $198 |