Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180712
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '19 at 09:37
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 806 78% 642 Pts	64-Core 1,280 79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Lighting 75 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 94.6 61% 79.8 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 75.4 Splatting 57.1 54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR500GB 500GB 2,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 189 2.1 115 9 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 511 Write 435 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 108 59% 270 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 1.2 46% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 21.5 DQ Mixed 0.2 19% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 92%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 136 138 136 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 138 Write 138 Mixed 79 SusWrite 136 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.4% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 17.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	840x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	297x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16