Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	15.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '19 at 00:08
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 81 2-Core 153 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 458 45% 367 Pts	64-Core 476 30% 476 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 94.6 Parallax 86.3 83% 94.3 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 91.3 Splatting 79.3 74% 91.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 467 427 421 438 414 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 604 Write 583 Mixed 583 SusWrite 430 124% 550 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 81.8 4K Mixed 43.1 138% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 401 DQ Write 99.6 DQ Mixed 175 148% 225 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 63GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 125 125 127 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 336 Write 114 Mixed 156 SusWrite 120 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 17.8 67% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 49.2 DQ Mixed 67.2 58% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 80GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 101 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 85.5 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 99.7 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 746GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 161 162 162 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 138 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 160 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 25fc Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 74 75 75 76 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 100 Write 95.8 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 75.4 108% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 62%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Read 19 Write 15.7 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 16.8 22% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 78% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 15%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 139GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 41 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 37 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 39.7 48% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series 20GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 14.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16