Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '19 at 23:11
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790 1,846 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.9 1-Core 132 2-Core 287 93% 170 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 1,059 94% 794 Pts	64-Core 2,657 164% 2,657 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2840 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 184 Reflection 205 Parallax 180 150% 190 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 185 Splatting 132 120% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 839 641 643 645 638 640 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,768 Write 1,613 Mixed 756 SusWrite 674 268% 1,203 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 205 4K Mixed 56.2 251% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,075 DQ Write 1,069 DQ Mixed 835 692% 993 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 152GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 434 398 369 369 370 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 426 Write 401 Mixed 369 SusWrite 397 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 33.6 136% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 339 254% 339 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 535GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 97 110 107 104 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 111 Write 57.3 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 102 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 84%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 180 177 184 174 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 491GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 146 146 147 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 126 Write 102 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 145 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 141 142 140 141 139 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 127 Write 89.7 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 139 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 96%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 128 127 125 127 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 97.2 Write 93.7 Mixed 72 SusWrite 124 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 48.1 MC Write 63.9 MC Mixed 40.4 145% 50.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 11.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16