Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$188 297,541 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 200 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 388 54% 394 Pts	64-Core 395 26% 395 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808 604,866 User benchmarks, average bench 136% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 176 Parallax 151 130% 163 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 152 Splatting 112 118% 126 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 150%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70 744,297 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 37 38 37 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 2,319,706 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 68GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 146 146 145 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 154 Mixed 104 SusWrite 145 107% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 45,494 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 72%, 45,494 samples	153x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 39,075 samples	120x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 45,166 samples	114x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $920

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16