HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 18:46
Run Duration1322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 95
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 328
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 88 103 91 98 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 88.6
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 88%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 22.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 13.5
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
414GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 23
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 13.7
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.6 1.7 2 2 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 31
Write 22.8
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 1.9
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
813GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 4 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 22.7
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 16.4
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 1.4
24% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 13 12 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 23.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 12.5
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback