HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3470-$96
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.4% Above average
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 180
64% 136 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 324
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 329
22% 329 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 113 105 112 110 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45% Average
Read 47.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 109
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45%
Great: 87%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 20.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 13.6
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 63%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
414GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 22.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 13.7
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 23.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 2
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
813GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 30.7
Write 22
Mixed 22.5
31% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 0.1
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 24
Mixed 24
SusWrite 12.4
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 4,395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $121
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $159Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback