Asus P6T7 WS SUPERCOMPUTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6T7 WS SUPERCOMPUTER  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 17:22
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 169
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 421
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 10.6
10% 10.5 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 18.7
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 37 27 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 217
Write 35.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 28.5
19% 88 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 8.6
59% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 8.6
12% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Intel X25-M 80GB
36GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 75 82 79 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 225
Write 83
Mixed 109
SusWrite 75.6
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 11.7
70% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 12.1
19% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36%
Great: 44%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
329GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 199 195 199 202 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 241
Write 234
Mixed 214
SusWrite 187
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 37.2
122% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.2
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 40.3
36% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 134%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
129GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 184 184 185 186 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 238
Write 221
Mixed 192
SusWrite 174
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 14.4
73% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 14.8
22% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44%
Great: 74%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 32 31 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 33.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 30.3
46% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T7 WS SUPERCOMPUTER Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P6T7 WS SUPERCOMPUTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $600
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback