PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P6T7 WS SUPERCOMPUTER (all builds) |
Memory | 19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101224 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 10 '19 at 17:22 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
75%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.2
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel X25-M 80GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 37 27 23 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Intel X25-M 80GB
36GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 75 82 79 82 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
329GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 199 195 199 202 204 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
129GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 184 184 185 186 188 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
WD My Book 1235 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 32 31 31 32 32 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 22x |
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples | 11x |
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 12x |
GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $600 |