Hp-pavilion FL230AA-ABU a6525.uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 23%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHp-pavilion FL230AA-ABU a6525.uk  (all builds)
MotherboardOEM_MB NARRA3
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 16:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.4% Poor
1-Core 41
2-Core 80.6
29% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 81.1
11% 81.5 Pts
64-Core 81.1
5% 81.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.3
2% 6.37 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.3
1% 4.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$35
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 15 23 38 22 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 74.3
Write 81.2
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 26.5
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FL230AA-ABU a6525.uk Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 26%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion FL230AA-ABU a6525.uk

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $70
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback