Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0H869M
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 13:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 88
2-Core 174
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 396
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 352.86
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.5% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 46.6
46% 53.9 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 54.4
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 129 200 220 223 226 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 172
Write 32.9
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 183
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 11
26% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
917GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 128 138 138 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 149
Write 83.8
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 119
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
347GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 93 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 84.7
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 93.1
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback